On 27/06/2013 8:37 PM, Steven Gardner wrote:
The argument (setting aside the retroactivity claim) is that Blob was immediately required to forfeit. Not doing so would to be sure be violation of the Rules, but it still can't happen unless Blob sends a message say that e forfeits.
Okay, for the sake of argument: if he's required to forfeit *immediately*, and instead he, for example, attempts to vote, then he's violating the rules. Correct?
-Dan
