Thanks. Comments inline. I'll wait for more feedback before writing a second draft.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:45 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest making it either pragmatic (announcement gets you stuff, > lying is a crime, because verification is difficult) or platonic > (correctly announcing gets you stuff, lying does nothing), but not > both. No reason falsely claiming to perform an action should be > illegal for only one type of action. > Got it. I'll pick one or the other. > It's not clear what happens if the announcement doesn't mention any > proposal. Aha. OK, a requirement that they specify the proposal should make it easier to resolve. > Also, there is no restriction on making multiple announcements for one > proposal. > My language for that was "provided no such announcement has yet been made in connection with that particular proposal." Is that too vague? > > When a player announces that e is due the acclaim owed a Class X Poet, e > > gains X operators chosen at random according to their Frequencies. > > Chosen by whom? > Right. I guess it should be the Herald, using the "in a timely fashion" language. Thanks for the consideration and the help. - Shredder
