On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 14:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Of if you prefer older history, Lindrum judged "3 minutes" or so as long > enough to provide for reasonable public review of the Lindrum World > judgement, before e declared that it had worked. -G.
Was that genuinely believed to have worked, though? Or back then, were judgements considered binding even if they didn't correspond to the truth? I very much like the Agoran method where judgements only influence player behaviour, and the actual resulting gamestate change is made via self-ratification as people update their reports accordingly. -- ais523
