On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > On thing that was particularly getting old was the "contracts = persons" > angle of that version. I wouldn't vote for bringing that part back. > Define the term properly: "A contract is an agreement between two or more persons." I had a thought some years back when there was a rash of transferring assets to all sorts of entities -- France, Hillary Clinton, a specific rule, or the asset itself. My idea was that "property" can be owned, a "person" (or some other entity/ies within Agora) can own, and anything outside the scope of the game doesn't count. Then my idea was taken over by a Group and never seen again. -- OscarMeyr
