On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 06:24 +0000, Eritivus wrote: > > > "Contracts" was the obvious answer to a question I had about an > > > idea, so I was pleasantly surprised to see your proposal. > > > > > > I'm FOR unless I see good reasons not to bring this back. > > > > I think people just wanted a change. Also, we'd reached the point where > > contract scams had started repeating. > > ....As ais523 said, repeal was just because > that particular version was seeming creaky at the time.
On thing that was particularly getting old was the "contracts = persons" angle of that version. I wouldn't vote for bringing that part back.
