On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and > Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: > > - Summary field on (some) CFJs in the CFJ database similar to how they are > listed in the FLR now. > - Field in either the CFJ or ruleset database linking rules to relevant CFJs. > > My FLR script could then automatically pull the descriptions of the relevant > CFJs from the database, > this would simplify adding CFJs, and remove the necessity to keep a Garbage > Bin around in the FLR.
This kind of handshake is *exactly* what I was thinking would be nice yesterday. However, I tried yesterday to look at a small handful of CFJs, and it's a LOT of work to write summary sentences that generalize well enough to be a Rules annotation, especially if I need to note what Rules are involved. One step is to encourage Judges to include Rule/version in their text whenever they cite a Rule (e.g. "According to Rule 101/34..."). Would make for easy cross-refs.
