On Sun, 21 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I judged CFJ 3449 on 28 Sep 2015: > https://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2015-September/033920.html > > It was over a month late, but we're definitely outside the Statute of > Limitations.
Also, to follow-up, because it's a general principle worth noting. We generally hold (again, past precedent maybe?) that for a timing violation, the violation occurs the moment the time limit expires - a person isn't "continually violating" the rule as long as e's late, e violates the rule (once) the moment e's late. This has some implications; for example, if an Officer is late with something, and a new person takes the office after the deadline, the new person isn't instantly breaking the rules by not doing the task. And for this situation, even if I hadn't judged and the case was still open, the crime was committed long before the current 14-day window for punishment. HOWEVER: this *is* a case where the precedent was so long ago, it would take a while to find it - and who knows if the same question would result in the same judgement today? So maybe it's more game custom than precedent at this point... I'll put that on my "cases to watch out for" list...
