I present these comments as evidence on the called CFJ and request that for the ease of all participants, the Secretary publish a preliminary report explaining the state of the game, if this were to be true. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Josh T wrote: >> You know what, I can kind of see the argument for imaginary numbers >> being reasonable. > > Do you know what I think happens? By R2483, a balance is decreased > by i and a balance is increased by i. But balance is a switch that > can only be integers, soo... (by R2162) > > If an instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a > possible value, it comes to have its default value. > > So everything for both parties is set to default (0 for players, 1000 > for Agora). Now *there's* a way to breed shinies for Agora. Or to > zero out everyone's shinies with transfers between players. Whichever. > > (nice one omd, welcome back). > >
