Well, in that case you were limiting your own ability to be fairly assigned judgements and therefore not acting in a manner fair for the Arbitor. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 09:14 -0700, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> My issue is where in the course of his judgement, he stated that a >> CFJ existed then immediately assigned it. > > I'd already attempted to assign it to myself earlier (if it existed), > so that was just reducing ambiguity. > > The CFJ itself also wasn't an attempt to resolve any sort of > controversy; rather, it was a situation in which it had been created > ambiguously, and the controversy was as to whether it existed at all, > not about what the judgement should be. So it really didn't matter who > judged it. > > -- > ais523
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
