I'm on vacation and only have mobile internet at the moment so I can't check, but does the rule specify that the trust tokens needed to win are to be issued by other players explicitly or that players can issue trust tokens and one needs such tokens from multiple players? In the event of the latter case it might be worth looking into because I think there is real ambiguity with how it interacts with Agencies and this is a good excuse to look into it.
天火狐 On Jul 20, 2017 13:38, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, all yours. > > And Ais523: We have serious CFJs about... a joke. Sending a nickle. I > don't know what's the standard for CFJs right now, but people seem to be > grasping at straws at what could be turned to become interesting. I'm > alright with sending my CFJ at a period of relative lull like this (which I > believe will be solved soon once the economy proposal gets settled). > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:36 PM, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 15:24 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> >> I'd prefer to spend a CFJ slot be spent but it's not an urgent CFJ at >> all. >> >> I'm be up for retracting it if you pledge that you'll resubmit it when >> the >> >> CFJ queue is empty enough (and if the economy eventually makes CFJs >> have a >> >> price, I'll refund you). >> > >> > Why would I do something like that? I was hoping to avoid a CFJ >> > altogether in order to avoid a judge having to waste eir time on >> > explaining yet a gain why such a ridiculously implausible scam doesn't >> > work. Delaying it wouldn't really help at all; there isn't a judge >> > shortage, just a shortage of tolerance for that sort of nonsense. >> > >> > However, if you won't take it from me, I can find an uninvolved judge >> > who will, I'm pretty sure, just reiterate the point that everyone else >> > has been making. I was just hoping to avoid the effort for everyone >> > (and the permanent embarrassment it'll create in the CFJ records). >> > >> > -- >> > ais523 >> >> I'd be happy to knock it out today, assuming Cuddlebeam doesn't bar me >> as soon as e sees this message. >> >> >> -grok >> > >
