"Since the rule now _has_ been assigned a number, does that mean this
rule change fails due to ambiguity?"
No because "currently" refers to when the proposal was promulgated and
it is abundantly clear which rule I mean: there is only one "Rewards"
with the sentence being replaced.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it fails because "the rule currently not assigned a number called
> "Rewards"," just doesn't exist anymore. I think it would fail similarly to
> how something like "In the rule called 'Cuddlebeam is amazing', add: yadda
> yadda" would also fail, because such a rule just doesn't exist.
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, nichdel wrote:
>>
>>> In the rule currently not assigned a number called "Rewards", replace the
>>> text
>>> {{ * Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 shinies.}}
>>> with
>>> {{ *Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 shinies. This reward can be
>>> claimed
>>> a maximum of once per office per week for a weekly report, and once per
>>> office
>>> per month for a monthly report.}}
>>
>>
>> Since the rule now _has_ been assigned a number, does that mean this rule
>> change fails due to ambiguity?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Ørjan.
>
>
--
>From V.J Rada
