On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
"Since the rule now _has_ been assigned a number, does that mean this
rule change fails due to ambiguity?"
No because "currently" refers to when the proposal was promulgated and
it is abundantly clear which rule I mean: there is only one "Rewards"
with the sentence being replaced.
I am not convinced. It is customary for proposals to contain conditions
like "if proposal NNNN has passed", which only make sense if conditions
are evaluated when the proposal takes effect.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
