I'm not CFJing bc I promised not to spend money but you can if you want to.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> "Since the rule now _has_ been assigned a number, does that mean this >> rule change fails due to ambiguity?" >> >> No because "currently" refers to when the proposal was promulgated and >> it is abundantly clear which rule I mean: there is only one "Rewards" >> with the sentence being replaced. > > > I am not convinced. It is customary for proposals to contain conditions like > "if proposal NNNN has passed", which only make sense if conditions are > evaluated when the proposal takes effect. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. -- >From V.J Rada
