On 09/10/17 12:41, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I've always disliked thought police rules, we've had them, but both > the burden of evidence and bad feeling make them a pain, and trying > to codify specific forbidden speech leaves loopholes where a scammer > can skirt the technical punishment while still being just as "bad". > > Going along with our current punishment metaphor, and recent discussion of > conduct, why not just implement an "unsportsmanlike conduct" card with some > general guidelines on what that is, maybe a higher bar for fingerpointing (I > dunno, > 3 support) and/or letting judges figure out what qualifies...
Democratizing sanctions on conduct sounds a lot like a popularity contest, and probably breeds just as many bad feelings.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
