On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > R869 has "A person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the > > rules) > > register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and > > reasonably > > unambiguously that e intends to become a player at that time." > > counter: > > IF you can't flip a switch to the same value that it already has, and have it > count as "flipping the switch" (recent CFJ question), and IF "registering" is > a synonym for "flipping the Citizenship switch to registered", THEN you are > "prevented by the rules" from registering due to the fact that you are already > in the registered state.
*sigh* The recent CFJ referred to up there is this one, which apparently still hasn't been judged: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3529 It is, in fact, the exact same situation as CuddleBeam's current one. (note, confusion exists because a later case was assigned the same number and judged under that number, but I don't think the original listed in the case log above was ever judged).