You can always judge it w/ QAZ. I was about to say I could but of course I cannot.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> > R869 has "A person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the >> > rules) >> > register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and >> > reasonably >> > unambiguously that e intends to become a player at that time." >> >> counter: >> >> IF you can't flip a switch to the same value that it already has, and have it >> count as "flipping the switch" (recent CFJ question), and IF "registering" is >> a synonym for "flipping the Citizenship switch to registered", THEN you are >> "prevented by the rules" from registering due to the fact that you are >> already >> in the registered state. > > *sigh* > > The recent CFJ referred to up there is this one, which apparently still > hasn't been judged: > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3529 > > It is, in fact, the exact same situation as CuddleBeam's current one. > > (note, confusion exists because a later case was assigned the same number > and judged under that number, but I don't think the original listed in the > case log above was ever judged). > > -- >From V.J Rada
