If you don’t mind, I will wait until it is clear who the speaker is via resolution of the CFJs before I deregister you. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/13/17 20:55, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> Without meaning to take away from the sentiment expressed in any way >> or anyone's right to express it, this little bit of win uncertainty is now >> *really* >> propagating into the game state. When VJ Rada made this appointment attempt, >> I almost CFJd on whether a conditional built on a conditional built on a >> conditional was beyond a reasonable effort to allow, now we're a level >> deeper... > > This is part of the reason I did a CC instead of immediate > deregistration. I can continue normal actions until the Registrar > deregisters me, so there's no chance of causing more reversion and > uncertainty in the meantime. > >> this little bit of Win uncertainty is *really* stre >> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >>> On 09/13/17 16:58, VJ Rada wrote: >>>> Because we currently have no speaker if Cuddlebeam was not the >>>> speaker, and because e is in both sets of possible recent winners, I >>>> appoint Cuddlebeam speaker. >>> After consideration, it strikes me as flagrantly beligerent to make CB >>> the Speaker. From a mechanical standpoint, e has a tendency to object to >>> things for no good reason and now has full veto power. From a >>> 'figurehead leader of Agora' standpoint, I have no intent of being part >>> of a community represented by someone prone to sexism, racism, and >>> misgendering. >>> >>> If CB is the Speaker, I submit the above as a Cantus Cygneus. >>> >>>> I also yellow card myself for being bad in several ways. >>>> >>> >>> > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
