This got out of hand quickly On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Perfectly legitimate usage, just wondering. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:44 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > forum shopping tbh. > > > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Why did you bar me and not o? > >> ---- > >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:47 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> I call a CFJ with the following statement: "The Green card o. issued > >>> emself in the below message was illegally issued, as the green card e > >>> issued nichdel was legally issued". > >>> > >>> I think the most natural reading of "that reason" is the act itself, > >>> not the particular rule breached. That is, someone can be carded twice > >>> for breaking the same pledge on two totally seperate occasions. There > >>> is also a question as to the interpretation of the pledge rule itself. > >>> It says "a pledge is considered broken if...", which may mean that the > >>> pledge is permanently broken, and cannot be broken more than once. > >>> > >>> I bar Publius and use AP. > >>> > >>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> > wrote: > >>>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:45 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> As for the gerontocracy argument: Money is an inherently > gerontocratic > >>>>> system. It abstracts value from labor in a way that allows arbitrary > >>>>> allocation. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm about 95% sure this is the gist of my partner’s argument when > she said > >>>>> “inventing money is _rude_” about the original Shinies proposal. > >>>>> > >>>>> I’m not sure I fully appreciated Spending Power while we had it. The > debate > >>>>> and adoption predates me. I’ve long had a fascination with > throughput-based > >>>>> monetary systems like Total Annihilation’s metal economy, where the > driving > >>>>> numbers are the amount of money in per time, not the amount of money > in the > >>>>> pile, and SP is as close as I’ve ever seen to that in a political > system. > >>>> > >>>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:30 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I point the finger at nichdel. He replied to CB in discussion again. > >>>> > >>>> As recently discussed, this is over a pledge under rule 2450, made by > nichdel, which reads: > >>>> > >>>>> I pledge to not acknowledge any messages Cuddle Beam sends to a-d, > or to respond in a-d to anything CB does. > >>>> > >>>> This pledge was previously broken, and punishment for that breach > issued from this office on Sep 20, 2017, at 1:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time. > >>>> > >>>> The message quoted above is, indeed, in response to a message from > Cuddlebeam, and violates the above-quoted pledge. Issuing a second card for > the same pledge appears to violate rule 2426, which reads in part: > >>>> > >>>>> A person SHALL NOT issue a Card unless: > >>>>> > >>>>> … > >>>>> > >>>>> * there has not already been a Card issued for that reason; and > >>>> > >>>> Therefore, as issuing a card would be ILLEGAL, I find this > finger-pointing to be Shenanigans. > >>>> > >>>> I issue nichdel a green card by summary judgement, as required by > rule 2478, for violating rule 2450. > >>>> > >>>> I issue myself a green card by summary judgement for violating rule > 2426, as cited above. > >>>> > >>>> I’ll note that I’ve now issued nichdel a card by summary judgement > twice in a week, and myself a card twice in a week. It is no longer > possible for me to card either of us for the remainder of the week, rules > requiring me to do so notwithstanding. > >>>> > >>>> -o > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> From V.J. Rada > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > >
