On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Oct 3, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
"The Date: header of an emailed public message constitutes a
self-ratifying claim that the message was sent at the indicated time.”
Far too powerful, given how difficult it can be for some clients to
display anomalous Date: headers.
"A Date: header in standard-conforming format", then?
I guess that won't do either, given how flexible standard formats are and
how stupid software is.
"A Date: email header in near-universally supported format". Nailed it.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
