On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assuming that Contracts are now a thing, I am going to reinstate the fox's
> vote shoppe.
>
> If Contracts exist, I create the following contract, titled "狐票店", by paying
> Agora 1 Shiny:
> {{{
> The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of 狐票店 (intended pronunciation
> /kit͡sɯneçjoːteɴ/). E has the exclusive ability to amend this contract, and
> CAN bar or unbar an entity from becoming a party to this contract by
> announcement.
>
> The proprietor CAN make amendments to this contract by announcement,
> automatically taking effect after 48 hours from the time of the
> announcement.I'm don't think they can take effect without a message at the time they take effect. > An unbarred entity CAN become a party to this contract via announcement. A > party to this contract CAN cease being a party to this contract by > announcement. All entities are considered unbarred unless they have been > barred. > > An unbarred party to this contract CAN invoke this contract by doing all of > the following, in the order they appear: > * The party selects a proposal or Agoran decision (henceforth the "target") > which (a) has been open for voting for at least 48 hours and (b) the > proprietor has yet to make a vote on it; > * The party announces they are invoking this contract, clearly specifying > the target e wishes to invoke this contract upon; failure to do so is > INEFFECTIVE. If the target's voting window becomes or is already closed, the > target is invalid, otherwise it is valid. > > When the aforementioned invocation has been made, an unbarred party to this > contract CAN: > * Make a bid on the invoked valid target by announcement and transferring > the bid, which consists of any combination of assets, to this contract. > * Retract a bid on a valid target they have made in whole from this contract > by announcement, whereby the contract will transfer the bid back to the > party who made the bid. > * If the party has made the most valuable bid on a valid target, (defined as > the party who has made the strictly greatest non-zero value bid, assessed at > the most recent market valuation of the Assets in Shinies available) they > CAN, on behalf of the proprietor, change the vote of the proprietor on the > target by announcing they are taking this action and paying the proprietor > one Shiny. Taking this action may be referred to as "making the fox vote". > > When the target is invalid, all of its non-(most valuable) bids are returned > to the party who made them, while the target's most valuable bid is > transferred to the proprietor. > > It is the onus of the party who wishes to make the fox vote to demonstrate > that the value of their bid is indeed the most valuable, meeting the > criteria. Shinies paid due to invalid uses of the said action are > non-refundable, and attempts to take the action without such demonstration > may optionally be disciplined with a green card (yellow for repeat > offences). > I'm not sure you can specify cards without a corresponding shall, although I'm not sure you can't either. -Aris
