On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Madeline wrote:
The contract doesn't give any limitations on their ownership.
The default is to disallow non-player persons (except contract parties)
unless the contract explicitly says otherwise.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On 2017-11-28 14:37, VJ Rada wrote:
Can persons own bills?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
I change my vote to AGAINST on proposal 7988.
I pay Ørjan 5 Bills for spotting a significant error.
-o
On Nov 26, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
<p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
As do I.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 26, 2017, at 9:26 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
I change my vote to AGAINST on minimal econ reforms.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no>
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 7982
Title: Referee Reform Fix
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: V.J. Rada
Co-authors:
At the end of rule 2478 "Viglilante Justice", add a new
paragraph with the text "The Referee CANNOT Point eir Finger. The
Arbitor CANNOT Point eir Finger at the Referee".
The title of the rule is misspelled, and also the text misses a period.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 7988
Title: Minimal Econ reforms
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing:
a) by announcement, and spending 1 Action Point, OR
b) by announcement, and spending the current CFJ cost in shinies,
OR
c) by announcement if e is not a player.
with:
a) by announcement, and spending the current CFJ cost in shinies,
OR
b) Without 2 Objections. Players SHOULD object unless paying
with shinies is a significant barrier to the Caller's
ability to seek a resolution to the controversy.
I might not be calling a lot of CFJs if this passes, then.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
--
From V.J. Rada
