True. We should probably add that to a general disambiguation rule. Seems to pop up a lot.
-Aris On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: > >> As for the split message, I sent the first one accidentally and the " >> ...for the purpose of paying for the land I won." part was just meant as a >> clarification to players. I believe that the payment works even without >> explicitly stating the purpose, as the relevant rule does not require that. > > > Interesting. That makes it possible to cheat by managing to have a payment > count for more than one auction (or possibly some other purpose that doesn't > state payments have to be exclusively for it, if there are any.) > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
