On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial > intent," after "past judgements,". > Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine intent. > - Otherwise, if e has not been awarded that type of Ribbon or > the corresponding type of Glitter since e last earned or > came to qualify for that type of Ribbon, e CAN, by > announcement, award emself that type of Glitter. > This would not allow multiple Glitter awards for consecutive Ribbons, e.g. from a series of proposals (except for the Assessor). Is this intentional? -Alexis
