On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote:
>> Replace the text "Rule 478" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the
>> rule entitled "Fora"".
>>
>> Replace the text "Rule 1789" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the
>> rule entitled "Cantus Cygneus"".
> 
> 
> Honestly, it might just be better to nuke the last paragraph of that
> rule - it doesn't really add anything.
> 

Middle ground: recognize that both "publicity of a forum" and
"Cantus/Writs" are well-defined terms of art so the "as described in..."
clauses aren't needed at all.

And here:
>     an action by a set of one or more dependent actions identified in
>     Rule 1728

R1728 starts:
>     The following methods of taking actions are known as "dependent
>     actions":

so again, the term of art "dependent actions" is well-defined so the
"identified in Rule 1728" is also wholly unneeded.

  • DIS: Re: BUS: [Propos... Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
    • Re: DIS: Re: BUS... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
      • Re: DIS: Re:... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... nch via agora-discussion
        • Re: DIS:... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
          • Re: ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
            • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
                • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
                • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion

Reply via email to