On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM nch via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:41:14 AM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > I submit the following proposal. > > > > -Aris > > --- > > Title: Certifiable Patches > > Adoption index: 1.0 > > Author: Aris > > Co-author(s): > > > > > > Enact a new power 1.0 rule, entitled "Certifiable Patches", with the > > following text: > > Any player CAN, by announcement, certify a specified proposal (as a > > patch), causing it to become pended. > > > > A player SHALL NOT certify a proposal unless its primary function > > is to rectify a bug, error, or ambiguity that relates substantially > > to a) an office e holds; or b) a CFJ, open within the last week, of > > which e is the judge. Certifying a proposal in violation of this > > paragraph is the Class-4 Crime of Uncertain Certification. A person > > certifying a proposal SHOULD explain why doing so does not violate > > this paragraph. > > This seems like it'll cause a lot of CFJs and uncertainty. > > -- > nch >
Could you elaborate on this? As I see it, there would be no reason for more CFJs to occur under this rule.
