On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM nch via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:41:14 AM CDT Aris Merchant via > agora-business > > wrote: > > > I submit the following proposal. > > > > > > -Aris > > > --- > > > Title: Certifiable Patches > > > Adoption index: 1.0 > > > Author: Aris > > > Co-author(s): > > > > > > > > > Enact a new power 1.0 rule, entitled "Certifiable Patches", with the > > > following text: > > > Any player CAN, by announcement, certify a specified proposal (as a > > > patch), causing it to become pended. > > > > > > A player SHALL NOT certify a proposal unless its primary function > > > is to rectify a bug, error, or ambiguity that relates substantially > > > to a) an office e holds; or b) a CFJ, open within the last week, of > > > which e is the judge. Certifying a proposal in violation of this > > > paragraph is the Class-4 Crime of Uncertain Certification. A person > > > certifying a proposal SHOULD explain why doing so does not violate > > > this paragraph. > > > > This seems like it'll cause a lot of CFJs and uncertainty. > > > > -- > > nch > > > > Could you elaborate on this? As I see it, there would be no reason for > more CFJs to occur under this rule. > There would be regular CFJs about what relates to rectifying, etc etc. Referee doesn't have full discretion on these things, e can be overruled by CFJ. -- >From R. Lee
