On 6/16/20 9:38 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: >> I'll be honest; this was not the outcome I was expecting out of that >> silly CFJ... >> > At this rate I may end up needing to split it off into a thesis or > something. It's turning into a bit of a tangent. Basically, your second > argument in the second CFJ is false, but once I figured out why it's false > I realised that it doesn't just explain this.
Aww... Full disclosure: if it was found true, I was planning to start calling cases on "<zombie> is <master>" in the hopes of creating even more confusion. > It also explains how to tell > what an arbitrary piece of Agoran text means. And that seems like something > worth writing down somewhere. > I... feel like I may be overhyping this. It's all obvious stuff. When you > read it it may be disappointing that it's stuff you already knew. It's just > that a bunch of previous judges have said "this shall be the standard" > without explaining why adequately, and I'm hoping I might be able to fix it. > > -Aris That still sounds really interesting, and my hype remains. Good luck! -- Jason Cobb
