On 1/22/23 12:42, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > Janet wrote: > >>>> [Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful >>>> stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to >>> Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions, >>> which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation >>> actually putting the Stonemason on different footing may have been >>> repealed earlier than that (I spot-checked about four months back but >>> didn't spot anything relevant). >> The Mason's stone both does nothing and will generally be owned by me, >> and thus count towards the 30-day lockout for getting actually useful >> stones. > Seems like just repealing it would fix both issues. Does being the > Stonemason give any advantage on the 30-day thing? Again, I suspect > it was originally enacted to solve some problem that no longer exists.
It would theoretically give the Stonemason first dibs after collection notices. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
