Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 15:36]: > On 4/10/23 15:32, juan via agora-business wrote: > > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-04-10 15:25]: > >> On 4/10/23 15:06, juan via agora-business wrote: > >>>> 8949* Janet 3.0 Might as well ask? > >>> Conditional: FOR if any of the following conditions are met: > >>> > >>> - Janet has pledged to vote FOR the first proposal that performs the > >>> following action, and no others: Turn juan's Emerald Ribbon Ownership > >>> to true. > >>> > >>> - Janet has successfully acted on eir own behalf to award juan a white > >>> ribbon. > >>> > >>> Otherwise, AGAINST. > >>> > >> I note the pledge condition is scammable. > >> > >> In general, I will not be politicking or offering compensation to try to > >> see this passed. In my view, I'm asking for forgiveness of a deadline > >> and not extra gameplay advantage, so I won't be offering any other > >> gameplay advantage. > > Wow, ok. Just tried to be cheeky and make a fun little action. Note that > > I also want forgiveness on a missed deadline. Just seemed fair. > > > Sorry, no rebuke implied. And I admittedly didn't check whether you had > earned that before sending, which I probably should have.
Its fine. I'm a drama queen. > You can \also initiate a Registrar election as the officeholder, and > you'll likely win if you want the ribbon. Hum… good point. Thanks! > > Anyhow, I change my vote on 8949 to FOR. > > > > P.S.: how scammable? > > > I could make a pledge to do so with a time limit of 1 second. I mean… > Allowing a pledge to expire without carrying out an action one pledged > to do in it constitutes breaking the pledge. (R2450) Also, the pledge's time limit must be a number of days: > The time window of a pledge is W days, where W is the value explicitly > stated by the pledge, or 60 if the pledge does not explicitly state > a value. -- juan
