I don't think that requiring 2 Bangs to kill someone will necessarily slow
down the game once the match starts. We've seen that players (others and
myself) can easily use Contracts to prepare beforehand to set up automation
which can lead to very fast wins.
Perhaps a player could only shoot once per X hours (72?), and it takes two
shots to kill someone?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 9:12 AM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:45 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > In any case, this has demonstrated that a 1 Bang = 1 elimination ratio
> > is probably not enough to handle high levels of trading – possibly
> > players should start with half a Bang rather than a whole one. (Because
> > the way you eliminate a player is, in effect, to transfer a Bang to
> > them, there will always be enough to finish the game unless players
> > start hoarding.)
> >
> > --
> > ais523
> >
>
>
> I submit the following proposal:
> {{{
> Title: It takes two
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors: ais523
>
> [Adjusts the number of bangs needed to eliminate a player to two. This
> should encourage trading and slow down rounds.]
>
> Amend the rule with title "Bang!" by replacing "by paying a fee of 1 bang."
> with "by paying a fee of 2 bangs."
>
>
> }}}
>
> I submit the following proposal:
> {{{
> Title: Ammo Store
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Enact a new Rule with title "Ammo Store" and the following text:
>
> {
> Each player CAN grant emself 1 bang by paying a fee of 13 spendies.
> }
>
>
> }}}
>
>
> --
> snail
> (Alive, 0 Bangs)
> (steampunk hat: creating new game mechanics)
>
