Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> +1.  Excellent plan.  I would hope that we still have intention to have
>                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> remote project definitions if the project wants to maintain them in their
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> own CVS.
>^^^^^^^^^^
>And a non-committer +1 from me ;)
>
[snip]
>
>>> Ultimately,
>>> much of this data may not amount to much more than an href to an external
>>> source, but this would be the cvs repository into which that href should
>>> be placed.

???

- Sam Ruby


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to