On 8/30/01 8:54 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Excellent plan. I would hope that we still have intention to have
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> remote project definitions if the project wants to maintain them in their
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> own CVS.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^
>> And a non-committer +1 from me ;)
>>
> [snip]
>>
>>>> Ultimately,
>>>> much of this data may not amount to much more than an href to an external
>>>> source, but this would be the cvs repository into which that href should
>>>> be placed.
>
> ???
>
> - Sam Ruby
Did I actually write the section starting with "Ultimately"?
I don't think so. However, along that line...
My view is that the central repository is a list of projects that has either
a pointer to a Alexandria-maintained descriptor for an project that doesn't
want to maintain their own, or a pointer to a descriptor that is maintained
by the project itself.
As an example, take a look at the experiment with JJAR where the Veltag JSP
taglib in Velocity hosts its own JJAR descriptor, and the central master
descriptor has a 'pointer' to it.
Geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
