Agreed. You mean XDoclet ? Then let's consider XDoclet an installed package until someone reports it builds fine ... ?
Don't you think there should be a policy like: a project which doesn't build for the past X weeks/months would go as an installed package until the build is fixed, at which point it will be restored, or something like that ? Anyway, I guess Sam would rightly tell me to run my own Gump ... Sorry about all this rant. I'll stop it here as it seems I am the only one concerned :-). It's just that the advertised Cactus nightly build feature has not been working for several months now and I was concerned for Cactus users ... Thanks -Vincent PS: Again I have nothing personal against Tomcat 4, nor XDoclet, nor other projects. I'm trying to find a solution to a general problem that can happen. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 July 2002 07:05 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fed up of Tomcat 4 failing to build ... > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If Tomcat is unable to build using Gump, why not consider it as an > > installed package. > > To be fair, Tomcat hasn't been built because of failed dependencies > most of the time. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:alexandria-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:alexandria-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
