On 7/30/02 2:24 AM, "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. You mean XDoclet ? Then let's consider XDoclet an installed > package until someone reports it builds fine ... ? > > Don't you think there should be a policy like: a project which doesn't > build for the past X weeks/months would go as an installed package until > the build is fixed, at which point it will be restored, or something > like that ? I have zero bandwidth right now to offer a patch, but how about building against the last known good of something? Once something builds once, then you keep that (or seed with a dist binary) and replace with the next successful build... Geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-203-247-1713 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
