Vincent Massol wrote: > > Agreed. You mean XDoclet ? Then let's consider XDoclet an installed > package until someone reports it builds fine ... ?
Last time I checked, you were a committer here. Note: while I committed the initial patch for xdoclet, it was on behalf of another individual who was not a committer at the time. In fact, see the comment on the initial commit. ;-) http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-alexandria/proposal/gump/project/xdoclet.xml?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > Anyway, I guess Sam would rightly tell me to run my own Gump ... Nah, I'd merely suggest that you to do something about it. ;-) - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
