@shashank: your approach fails for (2,0,0,0) & (1,1,1,1) but.. from any of the above approaches seen, we couldn't be 100% sure of the solution, but, from shashank's approach, the probability of finding correct soultion can be improved by using some random prime numbers. (running tests for more than one prime number)
and for any other approaches, a mathematical proof is needed to support the answer. (better accuracy over time is the trade off in the seen examples) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/z-3GHpDXLFoJ. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
