@jeevitesh :- yes i am also thinking of suffix tree,
 but i am facing problem in implementing it. did you implement it ??

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:11 AM, utsav sharma <utsav.sharm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> @hassan :- it will not work for many strings as you are checking from the
> mid of strings. try out "ababcdef","aabc".
> @atul :- it should be done in O(n).
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Hassan Monfared <hmonfa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> yes it's not valid
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:36 PM, anugrah <anugrah.agra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> So any string with two same characters is not valid??
>>>
>>> for example :
>>>
>>> GEEK has E followed by E.
>>>
>>> So GEEK is also invalid?
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 1:49 pm, Hassan Monfared <hmonfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > bool IsValid(string s)
>>> > {
>>> >  for(int len=0;len<s.len/2;len++)
>>> >  {
>>> >    int start1=0,start2=len+1;
>>> >    while(start2<s.size())
>>> >    {
>>> >       for(int i=0;i<len && start2+i<s.size() &&
>>> > s[start1+i]=s[start2+i];i++);
>>> >       if(i==len)
>>> >        return false; //"not valid"
>>> >       start1++;
>>> >       start2++;
>>> >     }
>>> >  }
>>> > return true; // valid
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > }
>>> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:52 PM, atul anand <atul.87fri...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > can be done with O(n^2) time complexity..
>>> >
>>> > > can it be done with O(n) complexity ???
>>> >
>>> > > On 6/3/12, utsav sharma <utsav.sharm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > given a string tell wether it is valid or not.
>>> > > > string is valid if there is no substring which have the same
>>> substring
>>> > > > following it.
>>> >
>>> > > > these strings are not valid:- "stringstring","geek123123rt",
>>> > > > "abcadabcad","strngstingstrngsting"
>>> >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to