To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 07:59:20 -0700 2006 ------- hr, how FreeBSD *is* building OOo is not as important as how it *should be* doing it :-) Generally, I think, no OS should rebuild OOo's STLport if it already has a compatible implementation. And when it does not, I'd rather OOo had it as a pre-build requirement, than built its own. This applies to all 3rd-party packages currently shipped with OOo. IMO, it is a big folly to bundle things like expat, python, graphics libraries, et al. instead of simply saying, they must be installed already. They are easy to install on a good OS, and users of a bad one will not be building OOo from source anyway. As you may read from this discussion, I tried removing the OOo's stlport directory from the tree prior to build, to ensure, that *nothing* from there will make its way into the compiled programs. If cmc's patches use that directory to force the system STLport -- fine, although I'd prefer direct use of the external STLport (either compiler's own, or the official one from SGI). My concern was the bit-rot... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
