To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103500
------- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 20 12:39:31 +0000 2009 ------- AW: Not so easy in SC. I tried to make all source rectangles one pixel bigger; that worked well but has it's problems in building the surrounding polygon. My idea now is to just use the discrete (pixel) based rectangles and additionally give a PixelToLogic transformation (DiscreteToLogic, inverse ViewTransformation). With that information, all needed operations can be done inside OverlayObjectCell. Maybe i derive OverlayObjectCell from DiscreteMetricDependentPrimitive2D; this would avoid adding the transformation and work view-dependent (in discrete units) from the beginning. Experimenting... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
