To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103500
User aw changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|STARTED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 20 18:13:54 +0000
2009 -------
AW: Okay, moved back to Rectangle list in discrete coordinates for
OverlayObjectCell's definitions. From this all data can be built. Also needed
for this is the added DiscreteToLogic transformation (same as inverse view, same
as PixelToLogic).
Also reworked OverlayObjectCell::impGetOverlayPolyPolygon() which did not work
reliable with old tools::Polygon implementations; the closed state of the
PolyPolygon was not kept consistent when more than one polygon was merged. One
more place with old tools polygon removed.
Tested with and with out XOR, committed, done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
