To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108766
User sem101 changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |NO-SOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from sem...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 31 13:48:13
+0000 2010 -------
BE & USE share the same dictionary/thesaurus. That's an oo issue.
If BE&USE tools were split then 'bad packagers' such as opensuse and pretty much
everyone else would not make the same 'mistake'. How is that so difficult to
understand?
I get your point
Why refuse to acknowledge mine?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
