On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 21:06, kevin ernste wrote: > > It seems to me that the Multiface is more extensible than the Delta > > 1010. And of course it has more ways to connect to other devices. But > > then it's a lot more expensive ($920 vs. $600). > > I think your instinct is right on. Do you see yourself wanting to use > this rig remotely?
Well... it depends. Probably. > The cardbus adds a huge "extensibility" factor. Indeed. > How about digital I/O? Most of my stuff is analog at the moment, and it will continue to stay analog for the predictable future (just a bunch of Alesis gear: QS6.2, Ion, Microverb4, M1 Active Mk2). > The 1010 also lacks a headphone out for some > reason. Yeah, but i'm planning to buy anyway a cheap phone amp or a control room matrix - a la Samson C Class Processors. > The HDSP matrix mixer allows you to route any source signal to any (or > all) output(s) simultaneously. The linux version of the mixer is nearly > identical to the MS version (I actually prefer it), so check the RME > page if you want more details. > As I said, people who have used it a lot can't live without it. I'll > admit it's a liberating way to deal with signal flow. So probably with the RME the channels are mixed in hardware, while with the M-Audio in software? (at least with ALSA?) > Pester away, and be sure to check the archives for other opinions. I > have been using both boxes in a studio I teach at for more than a year > and _still_ have not committed to buying one or the other for my home > system. One can certainly waver for too long ;> :-) -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
