On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 02:39 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > No, I don't. > > I realize that there were Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT, > Windows 2000, Windows XP. > > Or Solaris 4..10. > > Or whatever. > > That is, from time to time binary interface specs get updated as > necessary. > > Now, symmetrically, do you realize that refusal to stabilize ABI > indicates failure first to think and then to do ? > > > That is, Linux was not the first to implement suspend/resume, so > not taking this into account indicates a flaw/failure in the first > place. >
Um, the XP kernel has not been updated in years! You are proposing we go to a Microsoft-like release schedule where we only update the kernel every 3-4 years. You would have to be insane to propose that. You obviously don't know the first thing about how kernel development works. This thread is over. Please do not cc: me on any more replies. I can't have a conversation with an unreasonable person. Lee _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
