On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:33 AM Y. Richard Yang <y...@cs.yale.edu> wrote:

> Hi Luis,
>
> Thank you so much for starting this thread on Topic B. I feel that this is
> a crucial topic for the WG to investigate. Please see below.
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:18 PM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <
> luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Related to Topic B on maintenance of ALTO, as a way of summary of what
>> has been discussed during the last weeks, we could have two major
>> sub-topics:
>>
>> 1/ extension of ALTO to consider operational simplicity. Here fits the
>> proposal of introducing BGP communities in ALTO. The rationale is that
>> operators use BGP communities quite often as mechanism for applying
>> policies and determining certain behaviors on the IP addresses grouped in
>> the form of communities. This seems quite useful as well at the time of
>> exposing associated information (metrics, topology, etc) as enabled by
>> ALTO. An initial draft can be found here:
>> https://github.com/luismcontreras/alto-bgp-communities
>>
>> The plan is to generate version -01 for IETF 117.
>>
>

> I like this subtopic! I have adopted a view that ALTO should be divided
> into 2 layers: a concept/abstraction layer and a transport layer built on
> top of the concept layer. I feel that there is great work validating the
> concept layer, for example, the concepts of distance, ranking, say in the
> flow director, padis work. For transport later, the WG can be flexible and
> provide multiple transport mechanisms. BGP communities are an excellent,
> well defined framework to serve as a transport (of both existing alto
> concepts/abstractions) and also existing networking abstractions). Good
> direction.
>

To be specific, I think it will be a worthwhile effort to look into
BGP-ALTO; that is, how to use BGP to encode, transport and update ALTO
basic information. It can be considered a BGP vertical slice, with BGP-LS
as the lower lower layer. Make sense? I will add some more details to the
doc.

Talk to many of you soon.

Richard

>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to