On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:26:54AM -0600, Tom Hudak wrote:
I have a modification, it turns out the dumpers program was not u+x, so it
choked, now I'm getting "request to HOST timed out." I do not see a resolution
before leaving work tonight being reasonable, but If I should get any more
info in the next day or so, I'll repost.
>I have just ironed out my config, setup my clients and gotten amcheck to run
>without problems, after setting the "record no" global option, running amdump
>spits out this:
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> smb /home RESULTS MISSING
> smb /var/data/kalisa RESULTS MISSING
> homer /dev/hda1 RESULTS MISSING
> homer /dev/md0 RESULTS MISSING
>
>
>STATISTICS:
> Total Full Daily
> -------- -------- --------
>Dump Time (hrs:min) 0:00 0:00 0:00 (0:00 start, 0:00
>idle)
>Output Size (meg) 0.0 0.0 0.0
>Original Size (meg) 0.0 0.0 0.0
>Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
>Tape Used (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0
>Filesystems Dumped 0 0 0
>Avg Dump Rate (k/s) -- -- --
>Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --
>
>^L
>NOTES:
> driver: WARNING: got empty schedule from planner
> taper: tape Daily-05 kb 0 fm 0 [OK]
>
>^L
>DUMP SUMMARY:
> DUMPER STATS TAPER
>STATS
>HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
>homer /dev/hda1 MISSING
>--------------------------------------------
>homer /dev/md0 MISSING
>--------------------------------------------
>smb /home MISSING
>--------------------------------------------
>smb -r/data/kalisa MISSING
>--------------------------------------------
>
>(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.1p1)
>My question relates to the line's containing RESULTS MISSING (although I'm not
>sure how the -r got in there, the disklist contains the full path: "smb -->
>-r/data/kalisa <--". I
>have checked the amdump.debug, selfcheck.debug and looked for other .debug files but
>found
>none on both the server and the client. Neither the client or host .debug
>files contain anything about error's or problems, yet the error continues.
>What causes this? am I not looking at the right debug files? I have found MANY
>submissions like this to the hackers list, none of them seem to fit my current
>setup. This is a brand spankin' new config and I *believe* it's correct. Any
>info would be MUCH appreciated.
>
PGP signature