On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:43:50PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: ... > > then I created a dumptype that was the same as my regular dumps but with > > record no > strategy incronly > > I thought this would work, because the incremental would be based on > ufsdump, and it would know there had been a full, even though it was a > different configuration. > > Apparently, I've got this wrong. I'll check through the documentation, > but I thought someone on the list might have done something like this or > know either that it can't be done or how to do it as well as why. > (Possibly, amanda interprets incronly as "iff there has already been a > full at some time under this configuration.")
ufsdump might have been able to figure out from which date to do the incremental, `IF' it had been asked to do an incremental. However, as this was a new config, amanda "knew" there had never been a level 0 for this config. And of course it must start from a level 0 to do the incrementals. Even on a config meant to do incronly strategy you must do an initial full dump. jl -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)