On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau<martin...@zmanda.com> wrote: > We need to find a minimal patch that fix the problem. > Cat you try the attached patch?
This is starting to look like a kernel bug -- is there an associated OpenBSD bug or something that we could reference in comments in the code to explain this strange formulation? Also, we'll probably need to do this everywhere we fork and plumb a new process -- in pipespawn.c at least. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
