Digging around a bit, it appears that it might be a reference to a
file which is missing. From amplot.g, line 62 we see:

# file title has the parameters that this program needs
load 'title'
plot    "run_queue" title "Run Queue" with lines,\
        "tape_queue" title "Tape Queue" with lines,\
        "finished"  title "Dumps Finished" with lines,\
        "bandw_free" title "Bandwidth Allocated" with lines, \
        "disk_alloc" title "%Disk Allocated" with lines, \
        "tape_wait" title "%Tape Wait" with lines,\
        "tape_idle" title "Taper Idle" with lines,\
        "dump_idle" title "Dumpers Idle" with lines

Where is a developer when you need one? :-P

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH)
<brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov> wrote:
>
> It has been a while, title might be the org string from amanda.conf?
> I'm sorry, it has been years since I ran it regularly.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswon...@foundations.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:42 AM
> To: Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) <brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov>
> Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: Re: dumporder
>
> ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments 
> or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.
>
>
> The amplot utility is new to me. Here is what it says when I attempt to run 
> it:
>
> root@scriptor:~# amplot
> /var/log/amanda/server/campus/amdump.20181106020001.debug
> Displaying graph on the screen, <CR> for next graph : MISSING SPACE 
> DECLARATION "title", line 62: Cannot open script file 'title'
>
> I have both gnuplot and gawk installed on the backup server.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:10 AM Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) 
> <brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > There is an amplot utility that I used to run a lot, it would show me what 
> > I was constrained on, often holding space, which if you are running a bunch 
> > of large dumps to start off with could constrain dumping later on.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org <owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org> On
> > Behalf Of Chris Nighswonger
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:02 AM
> > To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> > Subject: Re: dumporder
> >
> > ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments 
> > or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:31 PM Chris Nighswonger 
> > <cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any wisdom available on optimization of dumporder?
> > >
> >
> > After looking over the feedback from Brian and Austin and reviewing the 
> > actual sizes of the DLEs, I ended up with this sort of thing:
> >
> > inparallel 15
> > dumporder "SSSSSTTTTTsssss"
> >
> > Which resulted in a reduced time over what I have been seeing. Here are 
> > some stats from amstatus for this config. It looks like I could drop about 
> > half of the dumpers and still be fine. Any idea what causes the dumpers 
> > over the first five to be utilized less?
> >
> >  dumper0 busy   :  5:13:42  ( 97.98%)
> >  dumper1 busy   :  1:12:09  ( 22.54%)
> >  dumper2 busy   :  0:40:30  ( 12.65%)
> >  dumper3 busy   :  0:33:44  ( 10.54%)
> >  dumper4 busy   :  0:03:47  (  1.19%)
> >  dumper5 busy   :  0:37:32  ( 11.73%)
> >  dumper6 busy   :  0:02:00  (  0.62%)
> >  dumper7 busy   :  0:00:57  (  0.30%)
> >  dumper8 busy   :  0:05:54  (  1.85%)
> >  dumper9 busy   :  0:04:38  (  1.45%)
> > dumper10 busy   :  0:00:16  (  0.08%)
> > dumper11 busy   :  0:01:39  (  0.52%)
> > dumper12 busy   :  0:00:01  (  0.01%)
> >  0 dumpers busy :  0:02:43  (  0.85%)                   0:  0:02:43  
> > (100.00%)
> >  1 dumper busy  :  3:39:13  ( 68.47%)                   0:  3:39:13  
> > (100.00%)
> >  2 dumpers busy :  0:23:10  (  7.24%)                   0:  0:23:10  
> > (100.00%)
> >  3 dumpers busy :  1:07:57  ( 21.22%)                   0:  1:07:57  
> > (100.00%)
> >  4 dumpers busy :  0:02:09  (  0.67%)                   0:  0:02:09  ( 
> > 99.99%)
> >  5 dumpers busy :  0:01:07  (  0.35%)                   0:  0:01:07  ( 
> > 99.98%)
> >  6 dumpers busy :  0:00:03  (  0.02%)                   0:  0:00:03  ( 
> > 99.59%)
> >  7 dumpers busy :  0:00:43  (  0.22%)                   0:  0:00:24  ( 
> > 56.35%)
> >                                                         5:  0:00:09  ( 
> > 22.36%)
> >                                                         4:  0:00:08  ( 
> > 18.89%)
> >                                                         1:  0:00:01  (  
> > 2.37%)
> >  8 dumpers busy :  0:00:20  (  0.10%)                   0:  0:00:19  ( 
> > 96.50%)
> >  9 dumpers busy :  0:01:51  (  0.58%)                   0:  0:01:51  ( 
> > 99.98%)
> > 10 dumpers busy :  0:00:41  (  0.22%)                   0:  0:00:37  ( 
> > 89.71%)
> >                                                         5:  0:00:02  (  
> > 7.13%)
> >                                                         4:  0:00:01  (  
> > 3.09%)
> > 11 dumpers busy :  0:00:07  (  0.04%)                   5:  0:00:07  ( 
> > 99.54%)
> > 12 dumpers busy :  0:00:00  (  0.00%)
> > 13 dumpers busy :  0:00:00  (  0.00%)
> >
> > I am going to give things another week or so and then try breaking up some 
> > of the very large DLEs in the config.

Reply via email to