I think you need to provide the name of the amconfig. I believe it reads
amanda.conf.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswon...@foundations.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:51 AM
To: Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) <brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov>
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: dumporder
ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or
click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.
Digging around a bit, it appears that it might be a reference to a file which
is missing. From amplot.g, line 62 we see:
# file title has the parameters that this program needs load 'title'
plot "run_queue" title "Run Queue" with lines,\
"tape_queue" title "Tape Queue" with lines,\
"finished" title "Dumps Finished" with lines,\
"bandw_free" title "Bandwidth Allocated" with lines, \
"disk_alloc" title "%Disk Allocated" with lines, \
"tape_wait" title "%Tape Wait" with lines,\
"tape_idle" title "Taper Idle" with lines,\
"dump_idle" title "Dumpers Idle" with lines
Where is a developer when you need one? :-P
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH)
<brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov> wrote:
>
> It has been a while, title might be the org string from amanda.conf?
> I'm sorry, it has been years since I ran it regularly.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswon...@foundations.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:42 AM
> To: Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) <brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov>
> Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: Re: dumporder
>
> ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments
> or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.
>
>
> The amplot utility is new to me. Here is what it says when I attempt to run
> it:
>
> root@scriptor:~# amplot
> /var/log/amanda/server/campus/amdump.20181106020001.debug
> Displaying graph on the screen, <CR> for next graph : MISSING SPACE
> DECLARATION "title", line 62: Cannot open script file 'title'
>
> I have both gnuplot and gawk installed on the backup server.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:10 AM Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH)
> <brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > There is an amplot utility that I used to run a lot, it would show me what
> > I was constrained on, often holding space, which if you are running a bunch
> > of large dumps to start off with could constrain dumping later on.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org <owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org>
> > On Behalf Of Chris Nighswonger
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:02 AM
> > To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> > Subject: Re: dumporder
> >
> > ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments
> > or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:31 PM Chris Nighswonger
> > <cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any wisdom available on optimization of dumporder?
> > >
> >
> > After looking over the feedback from Brian and Austin and reviewing the
> > actual sizes of the DLEs, I ended up with this sort of thing:
> >
> > inparallel 15
> > dumporder "SSSSSTTTTTsssss"
> >
> > Which resulted in a reduced time over what I have been seeing. Here are
> > some stats from amstatus for this config. It looks like I could drop about
> > half of the dumpers and still be fine. Any idea what causes the dumpers
> > over the first five to be utilized less?
> >
> > dumper0 busy : 5:13:42 ( 97.98%)
> > dumper1 busy : 1:12:09 ( 22.54%)
> > dumper2 busy : 0:40:30 ( 12.65%)
> > dumper3 busy : 0:33:44 ( 10.54%)
> > dumper4 busy : 0:03:47 ( 1.19%)
> > dumper5 busy : 0:37:32 ( 11.73%)
> > dumper6 busy : 0:02:00 ( 0.62%)
> > dumper7 busy : 0:00:57 ( 0.30%)
> > dumper8 busy : 0:05:54 ( 1.85%)
> > dumper9 busy : 0:04:38 ( 1.45%)
> > dumper10 busy : 0:00:16 ( 0.08%)
> > dumper11 busy : 0:01:39 ( 0.52%)
> > dumper12 busy : 0:00:01 ( 0.01%)
> > 0 dumpers busy : 0:02:43 ( 0.85%) 0: 0:02:43
> > (100.00%)
> > 1 dumper busy : 3:39:13 ( 68.47%) 0: 3:39:13
> > (100.00%)
> > 2 dumpers busy : 0:23:10 ( 7.24%) 0: 0:23:10
> > (100.00%)
> > 3 dumpers busy : 1:07:57 ( 21.22%) 0: 1:07:57
> > (100.00%)
> > 4 dumpers busy : 0:02:09 ( 0.67%) 0: 0:02:09 (
> > 99.99%)
> > 5 dumpers busy : 0:01:07 ( 0.35%) 0: 0:01:07 (
> > 99.98%)
> > 6 dumpers busy : 0:00:03 ( 0.02%) 0: 0:00:03 (
> > 99.59%)
> > 7 dumpers busy : 0:00:43 ( 0.22%) 0: 0:00:24 (
> > 56.35%)
> > 5: 0:00:09 (
> > 22.36%)
> > 4: 0:00:08 (
> > 18.89%)
> > 1: 0:00:01 (
> > 2.37%)
> > 8 dumpers busy : 0:00:20 ( 0.10%) 0: 0:00:19 (
> > 96.50%)
> > 9 dumpers busy : 0:01:51 ( 0.58%) 0: 0:01:51 (
> > 99.98%)
> > 10 dumpers busy : 0:00:41 ( 0.22%) 0: 0:00:37 (
> > 89.71%)
> > 5: 0:00:02 (
> > 7.13%)
> > 4: 0:00:01 (
> > 3.09%)
> > 11 dumpers busy : 0:00:07 ( 0.04%) 5: 0:00:07 (
> > 99.54%)
> > 12 dumpers busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
> > 13 dumpers busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
> >
> > I am going to give things another week or so and then try breaking up some
> > of the very large DLEs in the config.
