Giampaolo, > Nonono. I don't want banned messages which are also spam. Messages from > friends of mine which are spam gets blocked. Period.
Solution is coming with 2.5.0 in a form of keeping evidence of another contents category: blocking ccat. It is a ccat which is responsible for why a message was blocked (per recipient). In most situations it is the same as the main contents category (the highest ranking), but in situations like yours the main category stays 'banned', but a blocking ccat would be 'spam'. Most decisions will be based on this blocking ccat, like choosing notification templates, main log entry, quarantining settings, ... I have it already running. The plan is to release 2.4.5 and 2.5.0 in rapid succession, the 2.5.0 will bring this new feature, and a more informative nanny, both of which required some internal non-compatible changes, which is why I'm bumping up a version number. Watch this space... > Or do I miss something? What if I put PASS as the final destiny of banned > content? Is the banned content checked against SA *and* defanged (in this > order) before delivery? Defanging already works as expected (even in 2.4.4): for any ccat that requires defanging it is triggered, and a corresponding warning attached. Regardless of main contents category (and banning ccat). Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
